Skip to main content

Capital Letters and Honorifics

I spend a fair bit of time chatting online in kinky forums. It's a good way to meet people and learn about the lifestyle. It's not so good for finding people to play with, but that's another post.

Most kinky forums share a common etiquette for naming:

  • Dominants use upper case letters (ex: TheDom)
  • submissives use lower case letters (ex: thesub)
  • square brackets and curly braces indicate collaring (ex: thesub{TD})


I see this used pretty much everywhere: chat rooms, dating sites, news groups. It's logical and easy to understand, so it works great. Switches can have trouble, but they find a way to deal with it.

Submissives will talk in a number of ways depending on their personality and training. One common habit is to use the rules above for any word referring to a person. I am commonly asked, "How are You doing today Sir?" or "May i be of service to You Sir?" In a room full of people you will see sentences like: "How is E/everyone doing today?" I personally dislike this style; I'd rather see ones respectful nature reflected in thoughts and actions than an occasional click of the shift key.

Some submissives will also avoid referring to themselves directly. It tends to go with the more extreme forms of degradation play. "May this one be of service to You Sir?" or sometimes "this slave" or even "this worthless slut." I am not a fan.

Dominants have their own way they like to be addressed by a sub. Male Doms tend to use Sir, or SIR. Female Dommes have many choices: Mistress, Ma'am, Miss, Goddess, or even My Lady are seen. Considering the connotations and traditional meanings, I would be hard pressed to pick one. To make it more complicated, some dominants reserve certain titles for those they have relationships with.

If anything, too much respect is more annoying than not enough. If someone calls me Master, especially if it's the first time they talk to me, it comes across as insincere, almost as though they are mocking me. Usually it means they are horny and inexperienced, but it's still unpleasant. Excessive use of Sir or any use of SIR is similar but less pronounced.

The only thing that seems to work for all Dom/mes is to ask. "How would you like to be addressed?"

If you were to ask me, I would answer: "Talk to me like we're friends. I see Sir (big S, little ir) as a sign of respect, but I don't demand it. Throw it in when you feel it's deserved."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ball Stretching Without Fancy Toys

I came up with this simple technique while trying to fit my former houseboy into a chastity device . His ball sack was tight enough that the tightest A-ring he could wear comfortably would slip off when his mood changed. After just two weeks following these steps, he could easily wear an A-ring two sizes smaller. WARNING: I am only sharing my experiences. This technique has not been throughly tested. I make no promises that it will work, or that it will be safe. If you decide to try it, you do so at your own risk. I suspect this technique will be safe, but I am not an expert. Be careful, and stop immediately if it doesn't feel right. The only tool you need is some kind of cord that doesn't stretch. It's extremely important that it doesn't stretch, otherwise it can become too tight, and tight is a bad thing when you're wearing something long term. You need a foot or two of length, and a thickness of 1/8" will be the most comfortable. Start with a couple...

Book Review: Real Service

Real Service Raven Kaldera and Joshua Tenpenny First published in 2011 As the name implies, this book is all about service. It's filled with useful information about styles of service, the power dynamics of service, and practical information about serving. It's also has helpful lists to help you figure out your own style. They keep the text grounded in real experiences and stories while also providing insightful abstractions to illustrate key concepts. This was a fantastic book, and I learned a lot from it. I quite liked Joshua's four rules of service. The first in particular deserves to be repeated widely: "If the master doesn’t want it, it isn’t service." Another part I found fascinating are the three motivations for submission: transactional (doing it for pleasure, payment, or other personal gains), devotional (doing it out of love for the master), and positional (doing it because you are meant to). They talk about the advantages and disadvantages of each, and ...

Book Review: The Control Book

The Control Book by Peter Masters This book digs very deeply into control, and especially how to take and maintain control. It argues that most dominants have a natural ability to control, but a conscious understanding of the process can help us to improve and optimize our technique. I immediately connected with the book. I enjoyed the clear and deliberate style of the author, and found the natural progression of the content and level of detail to be perfect. My excitement started to deteriorate in the last half; it was all thoughtful and still useful content, but it felt a bit too forced to keep the conversation going. I also want to say that this is, to date, the best quality BDSM book I've read, though this is hardly a high bar to meet. A key theme of the book is understanding and appreciating the difference between conscious, subconscious, and unconscious effects. Effectively using all three types of reactions in ourselves and in our submissives will maximize your ability as a ...